What were the problems associated with the Indian division of history?
. The problem with the periodisation of Indian history by James Mill is that he divided the Indian history into Hindu, Muslim and the British period. It has been argued by many historians that it is not correct to periodise the Indian history on the basis of religion of the rulers.
What were the drawbacks of James division of the Indian history?
He divided the Indian history on the basis of religion i.e Ancient period was affliated to Hindus, Medieval to Muslims but Modern period to British not Christians. 2. He did not affliated the British period to Christian period.
What are the divisions in the Indian history?
Chronologically, Indian History can be classified into three periods – Ancient India, Medieval India and Modern India.
- Ancient India (Pre-historic to AD 700)
- Medieval India (AD 700 – AD 1857)
- Modern India (AD 1857 +)
What was the problem with James Mill periodisation of Indian history?
The problem with the periodisation of Indian history by James Mill is that he divided the Indian history into Hindu, Muslim and the British period. It has been argued by many historians that it is not correct to periodise the Indian history on the basis of religion of the rulers.
What was the problem in dividing Indian history into ancient medieval and modern?
Historians divided Indian History into ancient, medieval and modern. But this classification has its own problems. This periodisation is borrowed from the West where modern period is associated with the growth and development sciences, rationalism, humanism, logic, freedom and equality.
How did the historians divide the Indian history What problems does this division have?
Historians divide the past into large segments—periods—that possess shared characteristics. In the middle of the nineteenth century British historians divided the history of India into three periods: “Hindu”, “Muslim” and “British”. … On the other hand, the modern past is followed by the medieval past.
What was the limitations of the periodisation offered by James Mill?
It was not accepted by Indian historians because it did not provide a complete view on everyone. James Mill divided Indian history into three parts: Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation does not help use understand the lives of other minority.
How did James Mill divided Indian history?
In 1817, James Mill, a Scottish economist and political philosopher, published a massive three-volume work, A History of British India. In this he divided Indian history into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and British. This periodisation came to be widely accepted.
How did Historians divide Indian history 8?
Historians have divided Indian history into ‘ancient’, ‘medieval’ and ‘modern’. … It is a periodisation that is borrowed from the West where the modern period was associated with the growth of all the forces of modernity – science, reason, democracy, liberty and equality.
How history is divided?
Answer: Historical time is divided between B.C. (Before Christ) and A.D. (Anno Domini). … Another common way world history is divided is into three distinct ages or periods: Ancient History (3600 B.C.-500 A.D.), the Middle Ages (500-1500 A.D.), and the Modern Age (1500-present).
Why do historians divide history into periods?
Historians divided the past into periods based on the economic and social factors which characterize them. In doing so, they faced two problems. i) Economic and social changes kept taking place hence, boundaries cannot be drawn. ii) The medieval period is compared with the modern period.
Why India is divided in different states and districts?
India is a vast and diverse country, and for administrative reasons it is divided into 28 states and 7 union territories. The states are divided on the basis of languages, and New Delhi is the national capital. Rajasthan is the largest and Goa is the smallest state. States are further divided into districts.